Three Forgotten Facts About the Fort Hood Massacre

Finally. Four years after Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan walked into the Soldier Readiness Processing Center at Fort Hood, Texas, and perpetrated the bloodiest massacre ever on an American military base, the self-confessed jihadist’s court martial proceedings began this week. Have you forgotten?

Americans obsessed over the O.J. Simpson, Casey Anthony and Jodi Arias trials. Gun-control lobbyists turned Newtown, Aurora and Tucson into national awareness-raising, fundraising and legislation-promoting campaigns. But where are the celebrity lobbyists and high-profile advocates for the victims of bloodthirsty Muslim vigilante Nidal Hasan?

The White House, which downplayed the terrorist mass murder as "workplace violence," exacerbated national apathy for his evil acts. Our soldiers deserve better. Here are three facts you’ve probably forgotten — or never knew — about the Fort Hood terror spree.

—Fourteen victims fell on Nov. 5, 2009, not 13. Thirteen of our U.S. military personnel died in cold blood at the deployment center. But the death toll was actually 14. Pvt. Francheska Velez, 21, was pregnant when Hasan shot her during the first round of gunfire. At a military Article 32 hearing in 2010 (analogous to a civilian grand jury hearing), a survivor of the Fort Hood shootings testified that Velez cried out, "My baby! My baby!"

In his opening statement on Tuesday, Hasan (acting as his own lawyer) apologized to his fellow jihadists for not destroying more innocent life.

—The victims were all unarmed. Soldiers inside the deployment center were and are forbidden from carrying weapons — either issued weapons or personal arms — on base. When Hasan commenced his shooting spree by shouting, "Allahu Akbar," several brave men and women in uniform used chairs, tables and their own bodies to try to stop him. But it wasn’t until a courageous, armed civilian police officer, Sgt. Kimberley Munley, arrived on the scene with her 9mm Beretta that Hasan’s rampage was interrupted.

In a gunfight outside the deployment center, Munley wounded Hasan — who was able to return fire and shot her in the hand, thigh and knee. While she lay on the ground, Hasan kicked away her weapon. Another armed civilian police officer, Mark Todd, was able to fire at Hasan five times and brought him down.

Gun-control zealots led by the Brady Campaign To Prevent Gun Violence exploited Fort Hood to argue for even tighter gun restrictions. But it was a 1993 Clinton administration gun-control directive banning most military personnel from carrying their arms for personal protection that facilitated Hasan’s massacre except under very limited circumstances. Despite the death of 13 soldiers and the wounding of more than 30 at Fort Hood by a jihadist who warned his superiors that Muslim soldiers posed a specific threat, gun-free military base policies remain in place.

—Hasan’s military colleagues were more concerned with being accused of discrimination than with ridding our military of this known, deranged Islamic radical. In 2007, two years before he carried out his homicidal plan, Hasan laid out his murderous means, motives and Koranic inspiration for all to see.

His PowerPoint slide presentation to fellow Army doctors was titled: "The Koranic World View As It Relates to Muslims in the U.S. Military." Hasan warned: "It’s getting harder and harder for Muslims in the service to morally justify being in a military that seems constantly engaged against fellow Muslims." And: "We love death more then (sic) you love life!" As first reported by Pamela Geller, Hasan carried an official calling card with the designation "SoA (SWT)" — for "Soldier of Allah" and "Subhanahu Wa Ta’ala" (Islamic for "Glory to Him, the Exalted").

Hasan told his superiors he was not alone among Muslim soldiers who believed they "should not serve in any capacity that renders them at risk to hurting/killing believers unjustly."

He reminded the Army of the fatal 2003 fragging attack on American soldiers in Kuwait by Sgt. Hasan Akbar (who was sentenced to death but remains alive while his case drags on in appeal) and the desertion case of Lebanon-born Muslim Marine Wassef Ali Hassoun.

A Joint Terrorism Task Force had been monitoring Hasan’s communications with jihad spiritual leader Anwar al-Awlaki all along. But the military was not notified. Even without that information, military officers expressed concerns privately that Hasan might leak classified information to terror groups if he were deployed and that he was capable of committing a fragging.

Yet, they were prepared to deploy him anyway and did nothing to remove him from his job. One email from an Army investigator before the Fort Hood massacre fretted: "Had we launched an investigation of Hasan we’d have been crucified."

Instead, 13 soldiers and one unborn child were slaughtered and paid with their lives for our country’s reckless political correctness and bureaucratic fecklessness.

Michelle Malkin is the author of "Culture of Corruption: Obama and his Team of Tax Cheats, Crooks and Cronies" (Regnery 2010). Her e-mail address is


  • souvoter

    No, I haven’t forgotten any of our brave soldiers and especially the unborn innocent child. Our current government is despicable for claiming this atrocity to be work-place violence but unfortunately it is par for the course of our current idiot leaders.

  • Joel Wischkaemper

    Yet, they were prepared to deploy him anyway and did nothing to remove him from his job. One email from an Army investigator before the Fort Hood massacre fretted: “Had we launched an investigation of Hasan we’d have been crucified.”
    I agree with the above. But they should have bitten the bullet. Ignore what we know now.. they should have bitten the bullet.

  • therealguyfaux

    Aside from the religious angle, another reason Hasan was not cashiered was that his specialty as an MD mental health professional made him hard to replace, and they needed someone with his credentials at Damall Military Hospital at Fort Hood, to prescribe meds for the wounded soldiers being treated and rehabilitated there who were beset with anxieties such as PTSD, survivor guilt, the feeling that they were malingering and letting down their buddies still back in Iraq and the ‘Ghan.

    Not that I trust them implicitly, but CBS’s 60 Minutes did a story on such soldiers as I’ve just described, in which their mental health issues were discussed as well as the difficulties in rehabbing them for active duty again. Hasan’s continued retention was mentioned as a function of the Army’s need to keep doctors like him, despite the obvious warning signs.

  • Wheels55

    This is further proof that any nut job that wants a gun can get one and all the rules and laws cannot prevent that. Gun control laws only keep guns from solid citizens.
    The military needs to discriminate. Only men and women who can show, through their past, a real love for this country should serve.

  • Skip in VA

    Michelle: Great article! My oldest brother was a Commanding General at Ft. Hood in the early ’80’s (Gen. Richard L. Prillaman) and I had the opportunity to visit him and his family at the base. At that time the words, jihadist, radical Islam, etc., were not part of the lexicon. Something happened between then and now and I feel our government is part, maybe all, of the problem. The fact that this administration has described what happened as “work place violence” would have send my brother and his staff into a fit of rage over this. Soldiers are not supposed to die that way. The fact they did, and our government is using this description primarily because we have a closet Muslim for President, and this is a good way not to recognize their service and repay them for their wounds is an abomination. I could go on but you do a much better job and I applaud you for your convictions. Keep up the good work!

    • Wil

      Skip, You said “we have a closet Muslim for President”, you know this how?

      • Wheels55

        Because he is.