President Obama is excessively fond of defining “who we are as a nation” — which is interesting coming from someone whose campaign was based on bringing sweeping and profound changes to the country. He has resorted to this formulation when urging government-controlled, universal health care. He has used it to explain his (reasonable) decision not to release photos of the dead Osama bin Laden. He used it when supposedly rebutting the argument that we should “tear apart families” by deporting 12 million illegal aliens (a straw man since no leading American has proposed such a thing). He has invoked WWAAAN (“Who We Are as a Nation”) to justify vast new stimulus spending, and higher taxes on the rich. It’s pretty well guaranteed that when this president invokes WWAAAN, he has once again mounted his high horse, chin tilted up.
Speaking at the Human Rights Campaign meeting, the president was at it again, defining the upcoming election as a “fundamental debate about who we are as a nation.” Apparently, there are forces loose in the land who want “a small America, where we let our roads crumble, we let our schools fall apart, where we stand by while teachers are laid off and science labs are shut down, and kids are dropping out.”
Keep reading this post . . .