Both parties deserve to lose. They both had perfect opportunities to capitalize on the radicals in the opposing parties and doubled down on radical themselves. It really pains me to call my former party radical but hey, I don’t have much choice. The voices of reason in the Republican Party are bullied into submission by the crazies. Let’s hope this election finally brings sanity back to our politics
Old Bill O'Reilly has taken on himself of making up for Trump's deficiencies by not-so-subtly promoting his candidacy. He's repeatedly opined that Pres. Biden's policies are destructive to this country and that he (Pres. Biden) doesn't care and that VP Harris is worse than Pres. Biden, while at the same time he repeatedly opines how successful he thinks Trump's policies were and states that Trump's successful policies will continue if re-elected.
Then O'Reilly acknowledges that many persuadable voters don't like Trump for various reasons. In this case, O'Reilly says, simply "don't vote for president."
Yesterday, on his show, O'Reilly came up with a different approach to promote Trump's candidacy. He said that a vote for Trump is NOT a vote for Donald Trump. Rather, voting for Trump is voting for normalcy and prosperity (or something to that effect). In other words, O'Reilly's giving persuadable voters who detest Trump a rationalization for voting for the Republican candidate. Slick!
That and he continually gives Trump campaign advice on his show.
Instead of hiding behind his rhetoric of "fact-based analysis," O'Reilly should be honest with listeners by admitting that he's schilling for Trump.
O'Reilly's been in the tank for Trump since late 2015. He sheepishly pushes back on Trump's craziest stuff, but the spinning he does for the guy is still off the charts.
Agreed. That he feels it necessary to say that his coverage is fair, honest and fact-driven several times during each of his shows should be a tip-off to anyone paying attention. If someone repeatedly and gratuitously tells you he's honest and fair, chances are that he's unfair and dishonest.
Just read the piece, and I don't think I disagree with a single point French made about Trump and the Republican party. I've made most of the same ones myself. But no, it doesn't compel me to vote for Harris/Waltz.
Apparently, he appears as a pundit on MSNBC. Once when I was channel surfing, I saw him on MSNBC - it might have been with Joy Reid although I'm not sure - calling racist a charge against VP Harris by the Trumpsters, it might have been Trump questioning VP Harris' racial identity.
Both parties deserve to lose. They both had perfect opportunities to capitalize on the radicals in the opposing parties and doubled down on radical themselves. It really pains me to call my former party radical but hey, I don’t have much choice. The voices of reason in the Republican Party are bullied into submission by the crazies. Let’s hope this election finally brings sanity back to our politics
Old Bill O'Reilly has taken on himself of making up for Trump's deficiencies by not-so-subtly promoting his candidacy. He's repeatedly opined that Pres. Biden's policies are destructive to this country and that he (Pres. Biden) doesn't care and that VP Harris is worse than Pres. Biden, while at the same time he repeatedly opines how successful he thinks Trump's policies were and states that Trump's successful policies will continue if re-elected.
Then O'Reilly acknowledges that many persuadable voters don't like Trump for various reasons. In this case, O'Reilly says, simply "don't vote for president."
Yesterday, on his show, O'Reilly came up with a different approach to promote Trump's candidacy. He said that a vote for Trump is NOT a vote for Donald Trump. Rather, voting for Trump is voting for normalcy and prosperity (or something to that effect). In other words, O'Reilly's giving persuadable voters who detest Trump a rationalization for voting for the Republican candidate. Slick!
That and he continually gives Trump campaign advice on his show.
Instead of hiding behind his rhetoric of "fact-based analysis," O'Reilly should be honest with listeners by admitting that he's schilling for Trump.
O'Reilly's been in the tank for Trump since late 2015. He sheepishly pushes back on Trump's craziest stuff, but the spinning he does for the guy is still off the charts.
Agreed. That he feels it necessary to say that his coverage is fair, honest and fact-driven several times during each of his shows should be a tip-off to anyone paying attention. If someone repeatedly and gratuitously tells you he's honest and fair, chances are that he's unfair and dishonest.
To be or not to be. Harris not to be.!
Oreilly has made lots of money spinning his “no spin” garbage. Now he’s making a fortune off of trump worship like everyone else on the right
After reading David French's article, have you any thoughts of voting Harris/Waltz?
Just read the piece, and I don't think I disagree with a single point French made about Trump and the Republican party. I've made most of the same ones myself. But no, it doesn't compel me to vote for Harris/Waltz.
Apparently, he appears as a pundit on MSNBC. Once when I was channel surfing, I saw him on MSNBC - it might have been with Joy Reid although I'm not sure - calling racist a charge against VP Harris by the Trumpsters, it might have been Trump questioning VP Harris' racial identity.