5 Comments
⭠ Return to thread

John (pretty sure about this byline) - good interview. Clifford Smith was an interesting and he made a good case for 'Rationalizing Violence' makes no sense. Plus your interview style to avoid interruptions was great, as usual. Thank you.

Clifford's J6 view of repeating untruths that sync to you was troubling. For example, the only J6 death confirmed was the white Air Force veteran woman protester, Ashli Babbitt, shot and killed by a capital policeman (but never named by J6 committee or even held accountable). For all the faux concerns, Mike Pence was never touched, he & Nancy Pelosi were safely locked away in a guarded bunker. So, to repeat the J6 concerns that never happened and not to mention the ONLY death of Ashli Babbitt that DID happen is weak and biased.

I can agree with the main interview topic view that rationalizing violence is very troubling and anyone using it should be loudly criticized. Strangely, Clifford never mentioned the BLM Riots as the BIGGEST rationalization of violence where few rioters who murdered and destroyed billions of businesses, public buildings, and homes were ever mentioned or held accountable. Why did he never mentioned it?

His Iran views made sense. Biden and the FBI have never held Iran accountable for assasination plans for Pompeo & Trump. In earlier administrations, this could have justified as an act of war and even military action against Iran. But Lyin’ Biden does the exact opposite, he rewards Iran for their assassination attempts on conservatives by UNFREEZEING $billions$ to fund more terrorism, why? Sleepy Joe Biden never addresses the public, so it is up to guessing his rationale. The only explanation for such an illogical policy is someone is getting financially greased. BR Bob Ricketts Aliso Viejo CA

Expand full comment