She is a RINO with no spine and a lackey. The fact that you back up her nonsense and your specious reasoning makes me wonder about your cognitive abilities and your reasoning. What is "good for the goose is also good for the gander." or is it forgiveable that the previous buffoon in office of the Prez, got away with everything and briber…
She is a RINO with no spine and a lackey. The fact that you back up her nonsense and your specious reasoning makes me wonder about your cognitive abilities and your reasoning. What is "good for the goose is also good for the gander." or is it forgiveable that the previous buffoon in office of the Prez, got away with everything and bribery too. And that all the 4 years of disgrace are forgiveable, too. WTFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF ...
As a paid subscriber I sometimes must question my own judgement as to where I spend my money..Sometimes I really need to question it.
David, neither Bernie nor I are here to tell you or anyone else exactly what they want to hear.
Unlike many in the realm of political commentary, we tell you what we actually believe, and we base our views on facts.
I'm not a big fan of Murkowski either, but I am a big fan of the U.S. Constitution, and the job of a U.S. Senator is not to serve as a rubber-stamp for a president.
Edit: And David, I'd be interested in hearing what about my "reasoning" you fight faulty, or indicative of a loss of cognitive abilities. Or is it just that I don't share your strong contempt for Murkowski?
She has no spine? It seems to me a spineless politician would simply vote with her party. It takes courage to stand up for what you actually believe in. And yet you think she is spineless because she doesn't think Pete Hegseth is a good choice for SoD, and had the temerity to vote accordingly? As Bill O'Rielly often says - you need to get some fresh air.
"...is it forgiveable that the previous buffoon in office of the Prez, got away with everything and bribery too. And that all the 4 years of disgrace are forgiveable, too. WTFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF ..."
What is "everything" and where's the evidence that President Biden is guilty of bribery? Bill O'Reilly had Republican Rep. James Comer on his show - Comer headed the Congressional investigation into the alleged grift or bribery by President Biden. I think Rep. Comer went on O'Reilly's show to hawk his book about the evidence he claims he and his subcommittee found. He claims to have proof that President Biden was on the take from Hunter's China schemes. But O'Reilly failed to ask Rep. Comer why he and his subcommittee didn't push for impeachment.
But why didn't he and his committee do their duty to push for impeachment. After all, the constitution of the U. S. clearly states: "The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, BRIBERY, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors." (Emphasis added.) Bribery is explicitly stated as an impeachable offense! Of course, O'Reilly didn't hold Rep Comer's accountable for what Comer said. Why should he? After all, Rep. Comer's allegations were too good to probe. If O'Reilly had probed the allegations, his emotion-laden notions might be sullied.
She is a RINO with no spine and a lackey. The fact that you back up her nonsense and your specious reasoning makes me wonder about your cognitive abilities and your reasoning. What is "good for the goose is also good for the gander." or is it forgiveable that the previous buffoon in office of the Prez, got away with everything and bribery too. And that all the 4 years of disgrace are forgiveable, too. WTFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF ...
As a paid subscriber I sometimes must question my own judgement as to where I spend my money..Sometimes I really need to question it.
Respectfully.
David, neither Bernie nor I are here to tell you or anyone else exactly what they want to hear.
Unlike many in the realm of political commentary, we tell you what we actually believe, and we base our views on facts.
I'm not a big fan of Murkowski either, but I am a big fan of the U.S. Constitution, and the job of a U.S. Senator is not to serve as a rubber-stamp for a president.
Edit: And David, I'd be interested in hearing what about my "reasoning" you fight faulty, or indicative of a loss of cognitive abilities. Or is it just that I don't share your strong contempt for Murkowski?
She has no spine? It seems to me a spineless politician would simply vote with her party. It takes courage to stand up for what you actually believe in. And yet you think she is spineless because she doesn't think Pete Hegseth is a good choice for SoD, and had the temerity to vote accordingly? As Bill O'Rielly often says - you need to get some fresh air.
Yeah, the "no spine" criticism makes zero sense.
"...is it forgiveable that the previous buffoon in office of the Prez, got away with everything and bribery too. And that all the 4 years of disgrace are forgiveable, too. WTFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF ..."
What is "everything" and where's the evidence that President Biden is guilty of bribery? Bill O'Reilly had Republican Rep. James Comer on his show - Comer headed the Congressional investigation into the alleged grift or bribery by President Biden. I think Rep. Comer went on O'Reilly's show to hawk his book about the evidence he claims he and his subcommittee found. He claims to have proof that President Biden was on the take from Hunter's China schemes. But O'Reilly failed to ask Rep. Comer why he and his subcommittee didn't push for impeachment.
But why didn't he and his committee do their duty to push for impeachment. After all, the constitution of the U. S. clearly states: "The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, BRIBERY, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors." (Emphasis added.) Bribery is explicitly stated as an impeachable offense! Of course, O'Reilly didn't hold Rep Comer's accountable for what Comer said. Why should he? After all, Rep. Comer's allegations were too good to probe. If O'Reilly had probed the allegations, his emotion-laden notions might be sullied.