Another excellent and engaging, newspaper-worthy, opinion piece!
Vance may have won on style and delivery, I'm not sure about substance.
Walz had a golden opportunity to nail Vance on a number of issues but didn't even bring them up.
Where Walz fell short, was in pegging Vance to his hypocrisy. By signing onto Trump, the once "never Trump guy" acquired all the abuse and lies, including January 6, and who knows what if Trump loses again this time?
The point Walz needed nail is that pledging a commitment to democracy must be a two-way street. Candidates who reject the peoples' verdict were morally unfit to run in the first place.
Another excellent and engaging, newspaper-worthy, opinion piece!
Vance may have won on style and delivery, I'm not sure about substance.
Walz had a golden opportunity to nail Vance on a number of issues but didn't even bring them up.
Where Walz fell short, was in pegging Vance to his hypocrisy. By signing onto Trump, the once "never Trump guy" acquired all the abuse and lies, including January 6, and who knows what if Trump loses again this time?
The point Walz needed nail is that pledging a commitment to democracy must be a two-way street. Candidates who reject the peoples' verdict were morally unfit to run in the first place.
Much less a second.