>>This was the first time I listened to Vance. I found him not to be the monster the press has portrayed him to be.
I've been listening to him for a while. The Vance we saw at the debate hardly resembles the Vance of the last three years. As Matt Lewis aptly described, he switched from Mr. Hyde to Dr. Jekyll for the debate. It was a craft…
>>This was the first time I listened to Vance. I found him not to be the monster the press has portrayed him to be.
I've been listening to him for a while. The Vance we saw at the debate hardly resembles the Vance of the last three years. As Matt Lewis aptly described, he switched from Mr. Hyde to Dr. Jekyll for the debate. It was a crafty move politically, because a lot of people (you included) were hearing from him for the very first time. I think Walz was actually prepped for the Hyde guy, which I think contributed to his poor performance.
>>This was the first time I listened to Vance. I found him not to be the monster the press has portrayed him to be.
I've been listening to him for a while. The Vance we saw at the debate hardly resembles the Vance of the last three years. As Matt Lewis aptly described, he switched from Mr. Hyde to Dr. Jekyll for the debate. It was a crafty move politically, because a lot of people (you included) were hearing from him for the very first time. I think Walz was actually prepped for the Hyde guy, which I think contributed to his poor performance.
I've watched Waltz for a long time. You didn't see the real Waltz.
Agreed! My point is that the media largely isn't to blame for people's perception of Vance. His own words are.